Talk:Hippopotamus antiquus

possible skeleton
According to this Web site here, there's a nearly complete skeleton of H. antiquus at a Paleontology museum in Rome. I could find no other confirmation that this skeleton in fact exists. If anyone happens to be in Rome and can check this out, it'd be amazing to add the picture to the article. But seeing as this Web site hardly seems authoritative, I'm not flying to Rome just to check it out. --JayHenry 19:34, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was page moved. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:15, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

European Hippopotamus → Hippopotamus antiquus — Looking at the usage of the "common name" vrs the binomial shows that Hippopotamus antiquus is the much preferred name to refer to this species. "European hippopotamus" returns ~2,300 google hits and only returns three hits on goggle scholar. Hippopotamus antiquus returns over 90 google scholar hits and over 3,690 google hits. --Kevmin (talk) 03:57, 3 November 2009 (UTC)


 * That's fine with me. I had originally put it here because European Hippopotamus was the name I personally was familiar with.  But your google results suggest that Hippopotamus aniquus is quite a bit more common.  And as long as there's a redirect from European Hippopotamus, I can't see that it could cause any problems.  I say go for it! --JayHenry (talk) 04:05, 3 November 2009 (UTC)


 * And I was thinking it fit better with the naming scheme of the other hippo articles. --JayHenry (talk) 04:06, 3 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Support — In addition to the other reasons already mentioned, using the scientific name avoids such hideous phrasing as this: "the European Hippopotamus was not the only European hippopotamus". The target page name should be  (epithet lowercase).  --Una Smith (talk) 00:07, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Support, Google Scholar results indicate that "European Hippopotamus" is not a commonly used name. See also WT:MAMMAL. Ucucha 04:06, 7 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Considering the trand and overall lack of interest, when the move discussion is closed would you consider doing the move Ucucha? I would but I only have the access level to preform cut and paste moves. --Kevmin (talk) 05:34, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I gladly would, but I am not an admin here, so I won't be of much help. Ucucha 14:14, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Thanks for the page move Anthony. --Kevmin (talk) 23:27, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hippopotamus antiquus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070225183257/http://www.neandertal.uni-bonn.de/kongress_bonn/terra%20nostra08-3-8-06.pdf to http://www.neandertal.uni-bonn.de/kongress_bonn/terra%20nostra08-3-8-06.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080912012236/http://www.mountainecology.org/IBEX3/pdf/Art_Capitolo1/note_taxonomy_pleistocene.pdf to http://www.mountainecology.org/IBEX3/pdf/Art_Capitolo1/note_taxonomy_pleistocene.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:37, 4 November 2017 (UTC)