Talk:Homo reciprocans

Untitled
Should there be a section that details a criticism of this concept? Homo economicus has ones, and it would seem to do well that this one has one too.

I'm not super well versed in economic theory however. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayjazz (talk • contribs) 12:52, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

@Ayjazz ^ I don't think there's any 'criticism' of this as a concept, however I only found this page because of the link in the intro of the *Homo Economicus* page, which I do not believe should be there. Both models are valid models, and they are not 'in contrast' to each other because that's apples&oranges (if anything, they're complementary) Homo Economicus, like the mathematical models of his economic world, is strictly rational and is *not supposed to represent man as a whole*. Homo Reciprocans is an entirely different type of assessment of man, not some construct competing against, or in contrast with, Homo Economicus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.96.123.248 (talk) 23:03, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ronaldwsh. Peer reviewers: Gmagsino1, Qshablog, NickBabson.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Homo reciprocans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090725050331/http://william-king.www.drexel.edu/top/prin/txt/Neoch/Eco111t.html to http://william-king.www.drexel.edu/top/prin/txt/Neoch/Eco111t.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:55, 6 November 2017 (UTC)