Talk:Hope not Hate

criticism section
Does the Jo Cox thing really count as criticism? It's basically just someone observing that they put out an incorrect press release. To define that as criticism seems rather partisan. Conversely I see someone has put a tag questioning the importance of the fact the movement leader has been accused of islamophobia. Even if that is technically criticising the leader not the organisation at large, at least not directly, it seems a far better candidate for inclusion. Certainly if you were to keep one thing or the other I'd keep the latter. Firestar47 (talk) 22:08, 8 March 2023 (UTC)


 * https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-shamelessness-of-hope-not-hate/
 * How about this as criticism? Isaw (talk) 11:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * That doesn't seem noteworthy to me. Is this opinion important? BobFromBrockley (talk) 14:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

What about the idea the George Soros funds Hope not hate? And covert recordings of people who were 'informed' by hope not hate like BBC Panorama who were dropped by Panorama after their collusion was exposed? There isn't any criticism of hope not hate in this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Isaw (talk • contribs) 11:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Muttering "George Soros" doesn't strike me as a serious criticism. Rankersbo (talk) 09:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)