Talk:Hotel Chocolat

Fair use rationale for Image:HC white on black sq.jpg
Image:HC white on black sq.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:23, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging
This article talk page was automatically added with WikiProject Food and drink banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here. Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories, but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns, please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 23:54, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Advertisement, not article - should be deleted
This is not a Wikipedia article it is a blatant piece of sales blurb, almost certainly written by someone from the company. As no one has been able to edit it into a neutral entry in nearly seven years, surely it is about time it was deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.31.183.197 (talk) 15:23, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Surely if this article has been up for 7 years and no-one else has objected, it should be retained as a useful piece of information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magerius (talk • contribs) 18:14, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I've done a first round of re-writing and adding new content and sources. Tec Tom (talk) 19:22, 23 November 2022 (UTC)