Talk:Hunald II

[Untitled]
, any comment on the IP's edit to this redirect? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 07:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
 * It's not wrong, although I'm not sure a stub is really useful. My understanding is that historians are not agreed on whether the Hunald of the 740s and the Hunald of the 760s are one and the same or two different people. I do not know whether one or two articles is better for the reader, but it's an editorial decision. In either case both opinions should be presented with the arguments for and against them. Srnec (talk) 14:39, 21 December 2017 (UTC)