Talk:Hunting Trip

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHunting Trip has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starHunting Trip is part of the Parks and Recreation (season 2) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 12, 2010Good article nomineeListed
January 18, 2011Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 28, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that actress Aubrey Plaza said "Hunting Trip", an episode of the NBC comedy series Parks and Recreation, could mark the start of a romance between her character and that of actor Chris Pratt?
Current status: Good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hunting Trip/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 21:23, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very good article. I am confused by one issue, however, the inclusion in the Reception section of 'and called Ron's orgasmic reaction to Andy's shoeshine a "detour into an inspired absurdity that tugs against and tweaks the show's bureaucratic backdrop".' I thought that was another episode. It is not mentioned in this one previously. Xtzou (Talk) 21:23, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Whoops! You're 100% right, I had teh wrong reference in there. Sort of an embarrassing error, but it is now fixed. Thanks for the review! — Hunter Kahn 21:52, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: Pass!

Congratulations! Xtzou (Talk) 22:12, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]