Talk:Hunting Trip/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 21:23, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

This is a very good article. I am confused by one issue, however, the inclusion in the Reception section of 'and called Ron's orgasmic reaction to Andy's shoeshine a "detour into an inspired absurdity that tugs against and tweaks the show's bureaucratic backdrop".' I thought that was another episode. It is not mentioned in this one previously. Xtzou (Talk) 21:23, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

• Whoops! You're 100% right, I had teh wrong reference in there. Sort of an embarrassing error, but it is now fixed. Thanks for the review! — Hunter Kahn 21:52, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: Pass!

Congratulations! Xtzou (Talk) 22:12, 12 April 2010 (UTC)