Talk:Hunting Trip/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Xtzou ( Talk ) 21:23, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

This is a very good article. I am confused by one issue, however, the inclusion in the Reception section of 'and called Ron's orgasmic reaction to Andy's shoeshine a "detour into an inspired absurdity that tugs against and tweaks the show's bureaucratic backdrop".' I thought that was another episode. It is not mentioned in this one previously. Xtzou ( Talk ) 21:23, 12 April 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
 * Whoops! You're 100% right, I had teh wrong reference in there. Sort of an embarrassing error, but it is now fixed. Thanks for the review! —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  21:52, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Congratulations! Xtzou ( Talk ) 22:12, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: Pass!
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: Pass!
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: Pass!
 * Pass or Fail: Pass!