Talk:Icknield Way

Icknield Way and Icknield Way Path
The Icknield Way and Icknield Way Path articles have hatnotes that explain how one article is about the old footpath and the other is about the modern footpath. However, in both articles the lead and infobox seem to describe the modern designated trail (activities include cycling and the length is about 100 miles).

I assume that the split should be similar to that between Watling Street and A5 road (Great Britain). I have changed the lead and infobox accordingly, created a new section on modern paths, and removed a few categories. JonH (talk) 12:24, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Map Needed
This article is desperately in need of a map, and more especially because of the numerous alternative paths along the Way.Jezza (talk) 15:45, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I just had much the same thought. The template below will add it to a category that might just possibly attract someone's attention. Qwfp (talk) 19:21, 15 October 2016 (UTC)


 * I agree..this article needs a map 2600:1702:2340:9470:98B7:7AA1:2C0C:1EE (talk) 23:48, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Icknield Way. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110607202954/http://www.nationaltrail.co.uk/Ridgeway/uploads/The%20Icknield%20Way.pdf to http://www.nationaltrail.co.uk/Ridgeway/uploads/The%20Icknield%20Way.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080513203607/http://www.north-herts.gov.uk/wilbury_walk.pdf to http://www.north-herts.gov.uk/wilbury_walk.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:51, 11 November 2017 (UTC)