Talk:Ignace Reiss

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:27, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Ignace Poretsky → Ignace Reiss – I am the initial author of this article. While Ignace (or Ignatz) Poretsky is the most likely birth name of this spy, he became best known as "Ignace Reiss"--when he resurfaced at the time of his assassination. "Ignace Reiss" already redirects to "Ignace Poretsky": I recommend switching them so "Ignace Reiss" is main article and "Ignace Poretsky" the redirect -- this as a simple fix. Thank you. Aboudaqn (talk) 02:04, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Support. Clearly the most common name. A google books search shows 2240 hits for "Ignace Reiss", compared to only 129 for "Ignace Poretsky". Jenks24 (talk) 12:16, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Support, common name per cited sources and Google.--Kotniski (talk) 06:56, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Request for Comments
There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages.

The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person.

Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 05:19, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ignace Reiss. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://lccn.loc.gov/70449412
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110706224319/http://www.danielkunzi.ch/?page_id=142 to http://www.danielkunzi.ch/?page_id=142
 * Added tag to http://lccn.loc.gov/70449412
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110706222652/http://www.artfilm.ch/ignacereiss.php to http://www.artfilm.ch/ignacereiss.php
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110706224319/http://www.danielkunzi.ch/?page_id=142 to http://www.danielkunzi.ch/?page_id=142

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:39, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ignace Reiss. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20130218044446/http://ssdmf.info/by_number/130/130-14-7939.html to http://ssdmf.info/by_number/130/130-14-7939.html
 * Added tag to http://www.petitefleur.net/DanielKunzi/wp-content/uploads/pdf/Ignace_Reiss_montage.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100422222256/http://www.princeton.edu/~piirs/publications/world_politics.html to http://www.princeton.edu/~piirs/publications/world_politics.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:01, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Proper summary
- I did read the source, and therefore summarized properly what it say. One should actually read whole page, rather than cite something out of context. Author of the book (Volodarsky) simply tells that French investigation has established that the assassination was conducted by Soviet agents, nothing else. And that is exactly my version. What else info would you like to include? My very best wishes (talk) 02:32, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * First, I wrote this original, long entry. Second, I have, read, and reviewed the Volodarsky book.  Third, I'm tired of bickering with fly-by editors without expertise in the subject matter -- or, because you are or speak Russian, do our areas of subject matter expertise extend beyond molecular biophysics and bioinformatics and into Soviet espionage?...  Regardless, while you have dumbed down the nuance I created, you can keep it.  Uncle! - Aboudaqn (talk) 21:09, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * OK. Self-reverted. I think I understand what "nuance" with regard to French services you mean, but this probably will be lost by most readers.My very best wishes (talk) 20:57, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * You are the first fellow Wikipedian who has been gracious to me like this in ages; thank you. - Aboudaqn (talk) 01:05, 25 May 2021 (UTC)