Talk:Indo-Pacific languages

Untitled
What about the intense criticism this theory has received? It can't be omitted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.6.163.234 (talk) 02:11, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

How is it omitted? The article is currently highly critical of the hypothesis, if brief. I do not see a single positive statement about it; the article is even more lacking in that. --JWB (talk) 06:13, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Hey there
Why did you delete my comment ???? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.147.147.207 (talk) 14:29, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Opinion :
Just because i don't yet have an a account on this site that does't mean to discredit my opinions or finding, What i have posted could be very big eye opener.

This is censorship and this is Immoral and Shameful ノಠ_ಠノ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.147.147.207 (talk) 14:42, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Name
Hey, so there is another proposed language family under the same name. What should be done about that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tealyt (talk • contribs) 01:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Can you give some more info here about the other proposed language family with the same name? As long we don't have a page about it, there's no need to disambiguate the title of this article. And whether we should have a page about the other proposal, rests on its notability. –Austronesier (talk) 14:11, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

@Austronesier https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Indo-European_languages#Hypothetical_ancestors look here — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tealyt (talk • contribs) 19:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh I see. It was inserted with this edit without any supporting sources, and frankly, this looks like made-up stuff which we'd better remove, unless someone finds independent reliable sources about the "other Indo-Pacific". –Austronesier (talk) 21:11, 29 January 2021 (UTC)