Talk:InfoCision Management Corporation

Untitled
As representatives of InfoCision, we have concerns about statements that have been made on this page. Rather than stating a fact, the statements below are the opinion of the writer, and therefore should be removed from the page: “InfoCision responded the same day with a statement that did not address the substance of the allegations, except to say (1) if charities keep on coming back to them then they must be doing something right (2) acquiring new donors and reengaging lapsed donors could be costly (3) once these donors have been brought into the system, the charity will benefit from future donations from them (4) that it's not fair that people question their practices when for-profit businesses engage in the same strategies (i.e., loss leaders and free giveaways) even though that ultimately raises marketing costs.[11]”

To say that the statement (in link 11) did not address the substance of the allegations is inaccurate. Also, the writer’s paraphrasing of the statement reflects his/her bias toward the company.

We would like to propose a simplified re-writing of this paragraph to reflect an unbiased summary of the statement using a direct quote as opposed to one person’s biased view on it. “InfoCision responded the same day with a statement calling the reports ‘completely false and misleading.’” InfoCision’s statement also offers an overview of the types of programs they conduct for  clients and the goals of those programs. On August 17, InfoCision began a four part blog series on fundraising that provides a primer for those not familiar with fundraising.

NPOV
This page uses almost exclusively company internet PR statements as sources. NPoV check requested. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.64.191.140 (talk) 21:26, 5 January 2018 (UTC)