Talk:Interrupt priority level

Windows NT IRQL
It is amazing how author of this article avoid to mention Windows NT IRQLs. Absolutely nothing. If i could, i would add, but my english is poor. And i am not so an expert in this. Maybe some with needed knowledge and without hatred to Windows/MS, eliminates this stupid gap and adds info about irql here. I'm just wondering, person that wrote about vms ipl definitely avoided mention absolutely the similar approach in NT. Of course, both system had the same architect! And person who wrote this, knew this. As a result, stupidity censored article has been made, despite the fact, that exactly the part about nt irqls would be the most interesting part, considering the nt dominance and number of future (and now educating) driver writers. Once again, wp has proved to me as collection of biased garbage, place for emission hate to microsoft both directly and indirectly, and propagand fsf religion. 77.52.154.94 (talk) 23:40, 3 September 2013 (UTC)