Talk:Invesco

Dot.com bubble?
The statement about the company having 'relatively weak earnings' after the dot.com bubble is irrevelant. All asset management firms suffered throughout that period. The statement would only be true if it was worded: earnings were weak realtive to consumer stable companies. While that would make it correct, it would highlight the lack of relevance. Finance-writer (talk) 23:47, 12 December 2007 (UTC)


 * 'Relatively weak' compared to its own earnings (both prior to 2001/2002-ish and from 2005 onward), not to those of other companies. Additionally, I don't see why this relatively minor quibble led you to remove a lot of other useful material from the article. Gr1st (talk) 23:50, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Horrible Article
Can people please use complete paragraphs? Also, this article is for a GENERAL AUDIENCE, what the hell is AUM? I don't speak "business".67.190.86.13 (talk) 18:34, 17 September 2011 (UTC)


 * AUM = Assets Under Management — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:249:1780:349D:61D7:C576:A575:69D8 (talk) 21:52, 23 July 2019 (UTC)


 * @67.190.86.13 the article shows an old hq building. they have moved 2600:1700:3D93:930:4C40:8EB:6D97:E6EA (talk) 21:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)