Talk:J. Jon Bruno

Get Real
This reads more like a hagiography. It reads like it was written by church staffers.

None of the controversy surrounding Bruno and the four parishes that have left because of him is discussed.

http://www.glendalenewspress.com/front/story/38286p-56839c.html


 * Exactly what I thought. I wish I had time to clean it up. InkQuill 01:42, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-stlukes10-2009oct10,0,6123571.story

This article is really shameless in its promotion of J. Jon Bruno. Wikipedia always talks about neutrality and facts, but when the political sensibilities of the Editors is not offended, writers get away with biased articles like this. Shame on the Wikipedia volunteer editors. Live up to the principles you espouse.

Fair use rationale for Image:NewLogo4webSm.gif
Image:NewLogo4webSm.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Redirects
The John Bruno to Jon Bruno redirect is misleading. I would like to remove it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agh (talk • contribs) 18:02, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on J. Jon Bruno. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110702030344/http://www.ehala.org/ to http://www.ehala.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:59, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on J. Jon Bruno. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150811000613/http://anglicanink.com/article/misconduct-complaint-filed-against-bishop-jon-bruno to http://www.anglicanink.com/article/misconduct-complaint-filed-against-bishop-jon-bruno
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311055634/http://www.dfms.org/directory_18799_ENG_HTM.htm?menu=menu11145 to http://www.dfms.org/directory_18799_ENG_HTM.htm?menu=menu11145

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:05, 16 January 2018 (UTC)