Talk:Jennifer Love Hewitt/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
her faith
I inew she never bring up her faith and I was wondering. Did some hear that she was raised a Catholic ? I just wondering, becuase she show Ghost whispher seem to be blend of many cultures of faiths. (Danny Boy 07:30, 15 May 2008 (UTC))
Ghost Whisperer is only depicting one religion; Spiritualism. The technical advisor of Ghost Whisperer is a noted American Medium. He has met with Ms Hewitt and discussed the technical aspects of her character in the Series. He also reported (on Coast2coastam.) seeing real ghosts standing by Ms Hewitt while she was on Set. Ms Hewtt said she found such observations 'interesting'.Johnwrd (talk) 07:36, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Rich Cronin
I think her relationship with the LFO's ex-member is another urban legend, like those with Enrique Iglesias, Paul Nicholls and so on. Could somebody give any proof? An interview, an article, a pic of them being together... There is checked info about Lawrence, Friedle, Carson, Mayer... but Cronin? Mcedspam 18:48, 2 December 2007 (UTC) user:Mcedspam Mcedspam12;54'6 octubre 2008 puerto rico guillermo jose garcia vasquez hello nused —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.50.61.9 (talk) 16:57, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
As alluded to in #Hewitt had a stalker above, Diana Napolis did stalk Hewitt. The DN page was created yesterday and I'm wondering about adding it to this one somewhere, but I don't know if it's sufficiently notable. Opinions? WLU (t) (c) (rules - simple rules) 15:41, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Why is this article protected or semi-protected and there is no note anywhere that I have found explaining the reason(s)?
I believe there should be a note at the top of this article explaining to readers and editors the alleged why the article is protected or semi-protected. Does anyone know why this article is seemingly at least semi-protected without an explaination? Readers should be provided information on the alleged reasons why they can't edit it. 208.59.112.152 (talk) 16:57, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- It's semi-protected due to excessive vandalism and edit warring. If you look at the history of the page, you'll see it. Erzsébet Báthory(talk|contr.) 17:50, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- The anon has a point. There should be a semiprotection icon. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 19:53, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah I agree, there should be the standard informational notice at the top of the article explaining that the article is semi-protected. 208.59.112.152 (talk) 19:06, 19 November 2008 (UTC)