Talk:Jewel Changi Airport

Redirect to Jewel Changi Airport (there is nothing to even merge)
I don't need to use AFD, I'm not deleting anything because this article has ZERO unique content! Why in the world does this need to duplicate the information already in the other one? Background section: All about the Jewel, not the waterfall. Design section: All about the Jewel, not the waterfall. Structure section: Already in the Jewel article because this is part of the Jewel! Reywas92Talk 05:16, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Instead of constantly trying to bypass the consensus process, how about we try to improve the article? The Jewel entry should have a short summary of the Rain Vortex but not go into the details. There has been plenty of news media coverage that focuses on the Rain Vortex itself rather than the Jewel.  Sounder Bruce  05:33, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

, : I have moved the merge discussion to here, as it is typically done on the target page. robertsky (talk) 09:50, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I also see plenty of space in this Jewel article that is not prohibitive to an expansion of it instead. How about we improve this, then when it's at a place to justify a split we do that? The sources currently in the article as well as the ones in further research put the waterfall in the context of the building's architecture and without so much independent detail that it should be split from the main page. I just added another source and info about the design, but it fits just fine here, with no need for repetition. Reywas92Talk 18:42, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Key points are already in Jewel Changi Airport. Redirect. – robertsky (talk) 06:50, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

File:JewelSingaporeVortex1.jpg scheduled for POTD
Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture File:JewelSingaporeVortex1.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for May 14, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-05-14. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:57, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Significant WP:NOTTRAVELGUIDE violations
As of now, the Attractions, Facilities, and Access sections are excessively detailed with trivia about the various installations at Jewel. Much of the specific stuff about the attractions e.g. pricing, lists of F&B outlets on each level, specifications of the slides, and list of bus services can and should be removed as non-encyclopaedic. I've tagged the article accordingly and boldly reversed the Good Article nomination by as it would need lots of work to meet GA criteria 1b and 3. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 04:56, 8 June 2021 (UTC)