Talk:John Wenham

[Untitled]
The expression "a defender of Biblical inerrancy, but one who held to the position of "conditional immortality"" tends to give an impression that the view of the Bible is unconditional immortality, which is the very doctrine that conditionalists are in the process of refuting by the Bible (contrasting it with classical, that is, Platonic or Aristotelian theism). Using the conjunction "and" instead of "but" would be more appropriate and neutral. 93.142.245.249 (talk) 11:00, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. StAnselm (talk) 20:11, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Wenham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050924132722/http://www.biblicalhorizons.com/bh/bh072.htm to http://www.biblicalhorizons.com/bh/bh072.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:31, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Wenham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070817062459/http://www.ntgateway.com/goodacre/wenham.htm to http://ntgateway.com/goodacre/wenham.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:42, 29 November 2017 (UTC)