Talk:Jungfrau Park

Hello
Hello RickK !

Regarding the edits about "He went as far as grossly forge "proofs" (see Von Däniken" and " The overal impression is quite cheap ", I understand that the formulation is not appropriate... Do you think that there coud be alternative formulations which could save these ?

The part about Von Däniken might sound a little bit tendencious, but his claim to "educate" the population would probably be better presented with at least a lmited background on the fellow.

For the "cheap" part... I think you'd have to be there to judge -- it's hardly believable. I remember the badly adjusted projectors, the ridiculous flying saucer coming down from the ceiling "Ed Wood"-like, the lack of animations, ... I'm not even talking about the content of the message, but the mere means of commnication were really sub-standard compared to things like "Futuroscope" in Poitier. You se that there is even a press report which addresses this... (even in the context of "is expected to provide a boost for the stagnant local economy. The park has created 120 new jobs and the company expects to attract half a million people a year." -- now that say somehting). So again, do you think that a better formulation is possible ?

Thanks and cheers ! Rama 07:44, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Is it open now?
The official page link doesn't work for me, and I cannot find out. Does anyone know for sure? Kelisi 21:15, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

To Alli_jayne321
The entry has some serious style problems that could be resolved with better copyediting.Hoopes (talk) 18:32, 30 November 2012 (UTC)