Talk:KBC Advanced Technologies

Dubious edit - conflict of interest
User Kmbkctg has only ever made three edits - the edits to this article, all around the time the stock market press was first discussing takeover options. The name is an interleave of KBC and mktg. I can't help but wonder about the motivation and the veracity. -- Cain Mosni (talk||contribs) 13:40, 19 February 2016 (UTC) (cur | prev) 14:46, 23 January 2015‎ Kmbkctg (talk | contribs)‎. . (4,060 bytes) (-8)‎. . (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 14:45, 23 January 2015‎ Kmbkctg (talk | contribs)‎. . (4,068 bytes) (+595)‎. . (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 14:19, 23 January 2015‎ Kmbkctg (talk | contribs)‎. . (3,473 bytes) (+460)‎. . (Leadership and profit numbers) (undo | thank)

Contested deletion
I believe thus page should not be deleted because the company is well known in the industry. It is mentioned at a lot of places across the web. A search for the company phrase returns around 18,900 pages.

This page should not be speedy deleted because it is for a company widely known. It also has high presence on the internet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shahidilahabadi (talk • contribs) 18:35, 14 May 2011 (UTC)


 * The number of results on Google isn't relevant, what matters is whether there is significant coverage from reliable sources - I looked on Google news and search, and there are references that could be added to the article, so I've removed the deletion notice. Peter E. James (talk) 19:07, 16 May 2011 (UTC)