Talk:Kamen Rider Ghost

Ghost will re-appear in Drive final episode
http://www.jefusion.com/2015/08/kamen-rider-drive-episode-45-47-titles.html

It was also said that Lupin will be there too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.192.101.174 (talk) 08:33, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kamen Rider Ghost. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151209064042/http://www.hochi.co.jp/entertainment/20150730-OHT1T50286.html to http://www.hochi.co.jp/entertainment/20150730-OHT1T50286.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:13, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed merge of List of Kamen Rider Ghost characters
I am proposing to merge the article List of Kamen Rider Ghost characters into this one. The reason I'm here is that at WP:Cleanup, a cleanup request was made for the character list article, because it has two big problems: (1, the biggest problem) it is far, far too detailed (2) large parts of it are written in such a way that a reader who doesn't already know the series cannot understand. Of course, these problems do not mean it should be merged, but they do provide some extra motivation.

There are two reasons why it should be merged: (1) while the series is notable, I see no evidence that its characters (considered as a group) are notable, thus it fails WP:LISTN (2) it violates WP:NOTPLOT, as essentially all it is is an extension of this article's plot description (it does not discuss the characters encyclopedically, it just re-tells their part of the story).

Kind regards from  PJvanMill ) talk ( 23:01, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose on the grounds of WP:TOOBIG. So, Cleanup first, then propose merge. That is the proposal is too soon. Klbrain (talk)
 * Klbrain, I see that I forgot to say this explicitly in the proposal, but what I had in mind was a very selective merger. I think most of the content of the character list should be discarded. I figure if only a small fraction of the content is merged, then we need not be concerned that the target article would exceed the article size guideline. Kind regards from  PJvanMill ) talk ( 11:44, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I agree that we have the same destination in mind, and reminding myself of details at Merging I agree that a selective merge can be done in one step. Therefore, support a selective merge. Klbrain (talk) 10:23, 9 December 2021 (UTC)