Talk:Keldholme Priory election dispute

Source query
The source Burton, J. E. (2015) indicates a page of p. 123144 which looks to be incorrect. Should this be pp. 123–144? Keith D (talk) 21:57, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
 * You're dead right,, if you could sort it :) I've got a cold coming on and have taken the night nurse, so no more from me tonight. Cheers!  ——  SerialNumber  54129  23:38, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅ I have modified it. Hope the night nurse works. Keith D (talk) 23:41, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Many thanks, Keith-D. ——  SerialNumber  54129  18:20, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Main page appearance
This is to let people know that this article has been scheduled as today's featured article for December 14, 2019, and specifically paging the FAC nominator(s),. It would be good if someone checked that the article needs no amendments. The main page blurb text can be viewed and edited at Today's featured article/December 14, 2019.—Wehwalt (talk) 21:29, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, and other interested editors. This is to let you know that as a part of preparing this article for TFA I will be lightly running an eye over it for MoS-compliance and grammar, and possibly tweaking a little of the language to ensure that it is at it's very best for its appearance on the main page. If you have any queries about any of the edits don't hesitate to let me know. Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:45, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Arguably not worth bothering. Very little to pick at. I have read this before and chuckled, but I don't know why I didn't get involved at FAC. Cracking work. Gog the Mild (talk) 13:29, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Shame, I was looking forward to a Massive Edit War that ends up at Arbcom :p  Cheers! I guess this was what you were referring to then?! All is clear! *wonders how many RE classes mention this in the curriculum  :D   ——  SN  54129  14:52, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, you could always go for an entirely gratuitous punch up . Yep, that must have been the final inspiration - not that some of your Edwardian scallywags and at least one other ecclesiastical article don't also pass the oddball test. I must have been reading it entirely for pleasure; I don't know what came over me! Gog the Mild (talk) 15:03, 28 November 2019 (UTC)