Talk:Korean Air incidents and accidents

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Accidents

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the Aviation accident project.

Archives

Archive 1

'Entitled corporate attitudes and Korean cover-ups'[edit]

I don't believe the section about corporate attitudes referring to an incident where an executive went nuts over peanut packets is at all related to this page about their aircraft safety. Not to mention that your reference has gone bust. The aircraft ranking site is also a bust. Your referenced statistic is not particularly helpful or adds to the article. The authors of the ranking actually advise against using the ranking system as an indication of airline safety^[1].

There fore we like to emphasize the point that the current safety state of each airline is expressed best by the Safety Index and not by the ranking number. Please note that the tailoring of the Safety Ranking would look very different if it would not be 60 but 80 or 100 airlines in that listing... To dispel a common misconception about the JACDEC Safety Ranking: this list is not about the 60 safest airlines, it comprises the 60 largest airlines measured by their revenue passenger performance in RPK’s.

The report also uses data going back the past thirty years which would explain the lower rating overall while the general trend has shown Korean Air's safety to be greatly improving. Justinhu12 (talk) 09:23, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "JACDEC Airline Safety Ranking 2017".

[JACDEC_Airline_Safety_Ranking_2017-1] "JACDEC Airline Safety Ranking 2017".

[1]