Talk:Korean Air incidents and accidents

'Entitled corporate attitudes and Korean cover-ups'
I don't believe the section about corporate attitudes referring to an incident where an executive went nuts over peanut packets is at all related to this page about their aircraft safety. Not to mention that your reference has gone bust. The aircraft ranking site is also a bust. Your referenced statistic is not particularly helpful or adds to the article. The authors of the ranking actually advise against using the ranking system as an indication of airline safety. "There fore we like to emphasize the point that the current safety state of each airline is expressed best by the Safety Index and not by the ranking number. Please note that the tailoring of the Safety Ranking would look very different if it would not be 60 but 80 or 100 airlines in that listing... To dispel a common misconception about the JACDEC Safety Ranking: this list is not about the 60 safest airlines, it comprises the 60 largest airlines measured by their revenue passenger performance in RPK’s."

The report also uses data going back the past thirty years which would explain the lower rating overall while the general trend has shown Korean Air's safety to be greatly improving. Justinhu12 (talk) 09:23, 27 September 2017 (UTC)