Talk:Kurdistan Uezd

Autonomous oblast?
This entity did not have a status of autonomy. It was called Red Kurdistan Uyezd, and later Red Kurdistan Okrug. So it did not have a status of an Oblast. I attach an accuracy tag for the moment, but this error should be corrected and the article moved to a correct title. Grandmaster 13:21, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Kurdistan Uyezd? Weren't uyezds abolished by 1923? -- Aivazovsky 16:41, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * According to sources, Kurdistan uyezd was created in 1923, and for a short period it was renamed to Kurdistan Okrug, which lasted from May thru July 1930. Grandmaster 06:23, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Perhaps Kurdistan Okrug would be a better name for it as it was the final name for the administrative unit. -- Aivazovsky 12:16, 20 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Maybe, but another thing is that it only existed as an Okrug for about 2 months, and lasted much longer as uyezd. Grandmaster 12:34, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Mr. G.M., you dont happen to be an Armenian, do you?


 * Букшпан А.  Азербайджанские курды : Лачин, Кельбаджары, Нахкрай: Заметки /А. Букшпан; Выпускающий. З. Агаев Азербайджанский Гос. Научно-Исследоват. Институт Отделение Востока Баку, 1932.- 94 с.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asparux Xan Bulqar (talk • contribs) 19:48, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: not moved. There is a consensus to retain the current title. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:12, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Kurdistansky Uyezd → Kurdistan Uyezd – The article was stable at Kurdistan Uyezd for several years until late last year. Reasons for the move are ❶ per WP:UE (use English). The -sky (ский) suffix on Kurdistan is correct Russian, but it's not how adjectives are formed in English. This format is not used for other former Soviet subdivisions at Wikipedia either. E.g., Krasnodar Krai, not Krasnodarsky Krai, Evenk Autonomous Okrug, not Evenkiysky Autonomous Okrug, Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast, not Nagorno-Karabakhskaya... etc. ❷ per WP:UCN (use common names). Neither form is very common in quality English sources but the English "Kurdistan" (6 hits) has a few more hits than "Kurdistansky" (1 hit). (The informal "Red Kurdistan" [74 hits] is far more common if anyone wants to move it there). —  AjaxSmack  04:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

As for the argument that since the entity was a part of the Azerbaijan SSR, that may be a valid concern in some contexts, but here we are clearly dealing with a Soviet entity, and those are predominantly referred to using Russian conventions in English (i.e., if their names are transliterated, it's usually from Russian, not the local language). I'm not aware of any reliable English-language sources which would refer to the low-level administrative entities of the early USSR using the conventions of the indigenous language (and indeed, "Kürdüstan qəzası" produces no results whatever). I'm sorry, but I'm not finding this argument convincing.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); February 25, 2014 ; 16:10 (UTC)
 * Support. I believe the title should be Kurdistan Uyezd, as it is the English name of the entity, and this is English Wikipedia. Plus, the original name of this formation was not Russian, it was Kürdüstan qəzası in Azerbaijani, as the region was a part of Azerbaijan SSR, and it might as well be moved to its Azerbaijani title. But since this is en:wiki, English titles must be given priority. Grand  master  10:33, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * One can equally argue that "the English name" of the entity could be any combination of "Kurdish/Kurd/Kurds/Kurdistan/Kurdistansky/Kurdistanskiy Uyezd/Uezd/District" (and probably a bunch of other variants I'm forgetting), many of which produce a comparable number of English-language results when plugged into google search. That neither variant produces more than a handful of results, however, is a good indication that there is, in fact, no established English name for the entity. I refer you back to WP:UE on this subject, the second paragraph of which is dedicated to exactly this situation.
 * Oppose. We do have guidelines like WP:NCCS in place for a reason. For obscure low-level places like this one, it is so much more beneficial to have a consistent system of naming for a series of articles than to assign significance to "English usage" based on only a meager handful of sources. For upper level divisions (krais, oblast, okrugs) it makes a lot more sense to pick names based on sources because there are usually lots and lots of sources, but for low level divisions it's often boils down to just a silly exercise in cherry-picking (and may result in unexpected results such as "Red Kurdistan" being the most common variant in this case). It's like trying to establish a "common English name" for each of those thousands of selsoviets in Russia, going through each one individually! The bottom line is that any variants which happen to be in use can easily redirect to a standardized title thus taking care of all contingencies, while still allowing to retain consistent titling scheme for all articles. The uyezds are titled using the same system as the modern districts, and that worked out pretty well (in fact, I see the Ukrainian editors had to abandon their efforts to rename all district articles from a transliterated to "common" variant midstream precisely because the common usage approach fails miserably when deployed across so many articles and requires an enormous amount of effort to maintain). My philosophy is that for series of articles where the vast marjority of articles' "common names" are supported by fewer than a few hundred sources each (and usually a lot fewer than that), it's time to use NCCS. Uyezds, as well as modern districts and selsoviets, most certainly qualify.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); February 25, 2014 ; 13:05 (UTC)
 * Oppose. We have dozens of articles on uyezds, and thousands of Russian districts, which are all named consistently. Until reliable sources have been found showing that the preferential English usage for these entities does not have -sky, I find it dangerous to start renaming.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:27, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, for each individual case it's often not hard to find that there are a half dozen more sources using a name that does not utilize the "-sky" scheme, but more often than not it's the decision between six sources versus one or two, just like here. My point is that it's meaningless to talk about an "established English name" (or "commonly used name") when so few sources are involved. Indeed, the WP:UE guideline itself, which has been used as a substantiation for the move, warns that [i]f there are too few reliable English-language sources to constitute an established usage, follow the conventions of the language appropriate to the subject. And It is the standard practice in Wikipedia to romanize Russian names and place names (per WP:RUS) when no common English name can be established and when the sources are too few. Add WP:NCCS on top of that, and leaving this article at its current title starts making perfect sense.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); February 25, 2014 ; 14:47 (UTC)
 * Yes, this is exactly my point. We need sources that all uyezds/districts are using/not using -sky, otherwise we are going to have a terrible mess. Until the sources have been made available, we should keep transliteration, i.e. -sky.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose It's subdivision region of SSCB and officialy accepted as Курдистанский уезд/ Kurdistanskiy uyezd Maurice07 (talk) 12:12, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kurdistansky Uyezd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131004234100/http://www.kurdmedia.com/article.aspx?id=7857 to http://www.kurdmedia.com/article.aspx?id=7857

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:45, 8 May 2017 (UTC)