Talk:Kurt & Courtney

Fair use rationale for Image:Kurtandcourtneydvd.jpg
Image:Kurtandcourtneydvd.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Possible New Section
Should we include a section describing some of the errors included in the documentary that could not be cleared up before the release of the documentary. Ex- The test "proving" that someone could shoot themselvess while high on heroin was actually debunked prior to the release of the film but it was too late for Broomfield to correct it. The doctor involved verified that the experiment was flawed. So, should we include this info?BoyintheMachine (talk) 05:46, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Conclusive evidence?
I didn't think the film made it look like Courtney Love could of had him killed. It's part of the film but even Nick stops believing it at one point. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.94.251.19 (talk) 21:39, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Ditto. It's been a while since I watched it but if I remember correctly, Broomfield's conclusion was the exact opposite; that there wasn't enough evidence to suggest a conspiracy. 96.247.195.226 (talk) 00:42, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

I just watched this movie for the first time and there is no conclusion that Courtney had Kurt killed. Please fix this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.22.30.184 (talk) 04:17, 26 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Be careful here. The information about Ms Love surely falls under the rules of Biographies of living persons. Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 02:56, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Reception?
You mention the "mixed reviews", yet include nothing on the film's reception. In that same vein, the persons impacted by and featured in the film surely had statements to make - condemnation, sorry they participated, comments out of context, or stand by their statements? Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 03:01, 14 May 2015 (UTC)