Talk:Kwangmyŏngsŏng-4

Criticism
Why is it critisized? Doen't the USA also have launch vehicle, which could potentially bring a nuclear holocaust to North Korea? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.229.245.194 (talk) 21:42, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I do not think you'll get much response on this topic due to the rhetorical nature. Similar to, protecting a child already caught with his hands in the cookie jar. Why feed this scenario further? --roger (talk) 21:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Merge
I have merged the Article 2016 North Korean missile test with this article, since they both seemed to cover the same topic, and this article has more content. LoudLizard (talk) 18:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kwangmyŏngsŏng-4. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160807013905/http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/ap-exclusive-north-korea-hopes-to-plant-flag-on-the-moon/ar-BBvePu4?li=BBnbcA1 to http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/ap-exclusive-north-korea-hopes-to-plant-flag-on-the-moon/ar-BBvePu4?li=BBnbcA1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:42, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Reliable Sources
@User:Kirliator It is incorrect that it was challenged under WP:UNDUE as the claim is assertion of unreliable sources and not WP:UNDUE. Do you assert as fact that NK News, 38 North and TASS are unreliable sources? If so, are you unaware of general consesus in use of these sources in Wikipedia? Specifically NK News and 38 North which are focusing on North Korea. 77.217.233.160 (talk) 23:45, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Nonsensical non-English wording
Russian news agency TASS reported on February 22 statement by Colonel Andrei Kalyuta of Russia's National Space Monitoring Center, based on orbit of the satellite its in line with declared purpose, activity of satellite and equipment were confirmed. I have corrected some of it, but it is in a dire need of attention.--Adûnâi (talk) 20:16, 10 February 2020 (UTC)