Talk:Law of effect

In Depth
To discuss the directory of each page as they come, do not allow the filing of information to move upwards as it is not deemed as fair by law of practice.

Also there should be dividends to those who practice common law, those that do not practice common law should have a system put in place to correctly file each piece of information.

This Page should not include studies that have not been replicated by practicing professionals.

As it has been shown before that there is multitudes of mis-information presented to those browsing, as this is open source anyone could theoretically input any piece of information that they deem acceptable.

This could in turn jeopardise peoples individual thesis/practice.

I think that anyone who doesn’t understand how this OS works should contact WKI directly and discuss a contingency that allows people to fact check via Open Link.

SCTN 112 This piece of information isn’t viable as it discusses “studies” that were conducted 19 years ago by an independent firm that was a subsidiary of the compound manufacturer, this in my honest opinion is a conflict of Interest.

This is all I could find within this topic that needs amending, this isn’t a subject that everyone needs to subject themselves to as it is only minor details and doesn’t have an over arching meaning however the practice of having correct, concise points leading up to the final consensus allows confidence to thrive when looking at it as a whole.

These files are here to be edited.

When I have something to put into the system it will be more cohesive when I upload the file.

File Imput

These are quite simple to remember.

Directory imput on page 24 is quite self explanatory. Twriverm (talk) 12:09, 20 December 2022 (UTC)