Talk:Life University

Not the end of the story
There's much more to write about the controversy surrounding Life's loss of accreditation, including the recent restoration of accreditation. However, I'm out of time at the moment to finish. Others are welcome to take up the torch here; otherwise, I'll be back to complete the section at a later time. SwissCelt 12:21, 22 July 2005 (UTC) Per Controversy section - either the section needs to be completed or needs to be deleted, currently it does not have all the facts and leaves the reader with just partial truths. Tpalmer70 4:06, 1,Oct. 2011
 * I've finished the edits I intended to do at this time. I invite others to add information about the university's culture, alumni, and much more. -- SwissCelt 02:42, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
 * (A bit amazed to be participating in a discussion first started in 2005) What in the section needs to be sourced? What information needs to be added? ElKevbo (talk) 20:11, 1 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Really, the simplest way to resolve it is to point out that chiropracty is not a recognized medical specialty and thus all accreditation boards and higher learning institutions associated with it are not recognized institutions. Accuracy Banshee (talk) 23:06, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Under Controversy - the episode starts in 2002 and doesn't truely finalize till 2006 when the US DoE rebukes CCE for its handling of the LU accreditation and CCE's ignoring its own accreditation rules. The way "controversy" ends leaves the reader not seeing the whole picture that the US DoEd found CCE lacking in four major areas over LU's dis-accreditation. ~Controversy is a way to slap LU on Wiki without telling the entire truth and really should be deleted per the 2006 USDOE findings, if CCE had followed its own rules, the outcome would have been different~ Do you need the source for the 2006 USDOE letter? Tpalmer70 15:11, 28,Oct. 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.29.182.118 (talk) 19:14, 28 October 2011 (UTC)