Talk:Lingotto

Dead links
There are many dead links — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.237.213.234 (talk) 17:21, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Which do you mean? There are two links in references, neither of which seem dead to me. Mark in wiki (talk) 20:12, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Maybe the IP user is talking about wp:red links.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:08, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lingotto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927200307/http://www.focchi.it/projects/lingotto-exhibition-center/ to http://www.focchi.it/projects/lingotto-exhibition-center/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:03, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lingotto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070126110909/http://www.fotogian.com/oval.html to http://www.fotogian.com/oval.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:45, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Split Proposal
I propose the article be Split into Lingotto (district) referring to the geographical area within Turin, and Lingotto (building), referring to the multipurpose building in Via Nizza, as the two are completely separate topics. The introduction of this article makes it seem as if the article is about both, which is really confusing, specially when it's mostly about the building.

Thanks Milo8505 (talk) 14:49, 1 May 2023 (UTC)


 * I agree that the current situation is very confusing, and that it should definitely be tidied. However, the article is already light on reliable sources as is. Do you have sources in mind that could be used to sustain both an article about the Turino district separate from the building, and an article on the building only?
 * The alternative would be to remodel the current content about the building into a section on the building and then try to expand remaining sections of the article with content on the Turino district. Felix QW (talk) 10:40, 21 May 2023 (UTC)


 * I agree they should be split, as they are quite different topics, but am a bit concerned that would leave two very short articles. Provided that you are comfortable that over time the articles will grow, I'd go ahead and do it. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 08:44, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I completed the split as the topics are very distinct and there is plenty of material to translate from their corresponding Italian articles. – Brandon XLF  (talk) 22:59, 2 May 2024 (UTC)