Talk:List of British divisions in the First World War

Untitled
On the pages which lead from here, in which the several divisions are described, the first heading is "Unit History". In those articles I have seen, there is little under this heading as yet but there is a great deal of scope for filling it out. I suggest that the "Unit history" should be placed after "Battles". In this way we should have the summary of the division before the detail of its work. We should know what we were reading about before we engaged in a long history.

Unless I find a strong argument against this, I shall move the headings in the divisional pages accordingly. (RJP 10:35, 29 September 2005 (UTC))

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of British divisions in World War I. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040402040349/http://www.1914-1918.net/menu_army.htm to http://www.1914-1918.net/menu_army.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:10, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

63rd (Royal Naval) Division
Is there any reason why the 63rd (Royal Naval) Division is marked as a New Army division? Surely if there was ever a good candidate for "Other" this unique outfit (Royal Navy and Royal Marine personnel serving under command of the War Office) would be it!

TomboPC (talk) 22:32, 3 September 2021 (UTC)