Talk:List of Gilmore Girls episodes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hyperlinks[edit]

If there isn't a page on the episode, please remove the link. When you click on it, it says editing...PeachGal 04:46, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea. Salad Days 06:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshots[edit]

I created "Category: Screenshots of Gilmore Girls" for all uploaded screenshots from episodes of Gilmore Girls. Sarahjane10784 21:23, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Episode pages AfD[edit]

Somebody has nominated several of your episode pages for deletion (Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/French_Twist_(Gilmore_Girls)) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MatthewFenton (talkcontribs) 00:13, 27 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Emily's staff[edit]

How about a column giving the name of Emily's servant? since it changes in each episode. Heh. —Tamfang 07:16, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Episode Names With "-pay"[edit]

A number of episodes have "-pay" appended to them for no apparent reason (unless there's a Wikipedia standard I'm not aware of). I cannot find "-pay" in any episode name in the Gilmore Girls DVD liner notes nor online. Can they be removed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.198.176.114 (talk) 03:28, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Policy discussion in progress[edit]

There is a policy discussion in progress at the Manual of Style which affects this page, suggesting that the capitalization of "like" in the episode titles here should be removed. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — LlywelynII 14:05, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Gilmore Girls: A Year in the Life#Separation from Gilmore Girls. Alex|The|Whovian? 02:45, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@AlexTheWhovian: Hi there, I'm responding to this edit. Believe me when I say I wish AYITL wasn't a part of the original show, and I personally like to pretend it isn't, but I think that formally it needs to be considered as such. It's 100% a continuation - there are no completely new storylines, almost the entire cast returned, and there's very few new characters (certainly none of any significance). I don't believe any journalist reported it as a "reboot", or anything that implies a distinct series. It's considered a new chapter of the old show. It's right that we have a separate article for the revival but only in the way that we also have separate articles for each season. When it comes to unifying and listing all episodes, it makes no sense to exclude AYITL. --Loeba (talk) 20:05, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It may need to be considered as such, but at the moment, it is not and has not been for months, and we need consistency between all of the articles. Note that the article for the original series lists 7 seasons and 153 episodes, with an original release date range of October 5, 2000 – May 15, 2007. The Gilmore Girls: A Year in the Life article uses {{Infobox television}} with a count of 1 season and 4 episodes, which is used for series, rather than {{Infobox television season}}, which would indicate that it is a separate season. We cannot list this information as it is and also include it on this article, there is too much inconsistency. Per the original link above from last year, I provided another example of a continuation of a series that has been split on Wikipedia. -- AlexTW 21:35, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It seems a shame to exclude it purely for infobox formalities, and I feel like there must be a way around that...? Like, the infobox for the parent article could say "7 seasons + special miniseries" and "153 episodes + 4 revival episodes"? Something like that. Let's try and be flexible and creative with our options, there's not enough of that on wikipedia :) --Loeba (talk) 21:59, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@AlexTheWhovian: So I've tried this for the infobox on the parent article "No. of seasons: 7 + special miniseries" "No. of episodes: 153 + 4 special episodes". What do you think? I know it's unconventional but I think it's a good solution for this unusual situation, and means we can include AYITL here. --Loeba (talk) 13:43, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, no objection so I've added the episodes back. --Loeba (talk) 19:04, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Now that I've fixed it, it's still incredibly inconsistent, and should be restored. I think I may bring this up at the WikiProject Television, as articles such as Heroes and Twin Peaks also use a separated format. -- AlexTW 01:17, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Needs fixing[edit]

Hi the format needs fixing but I don't know how and don't want to mess it up... GaspodeNeil (talk) 20:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]