Talk:List of Quebec general elections

Participation rate
It would be nice to see the participation rate throughout history. Tonight is election night, and I heard it was a historical low (56%). Would like to see how true that is, if someone can dig that up.

Also, it may be more relevant to place the ADQ next to the PQ, instead of after the Union nationale (i.e. revert the order Conservative-UN-ADQ to ADQ-UN-Cons. Just seems that most people will want to compare the most recent elections, and the UN and Conservatives are long gone political parties.  69.157.157.127 (talk) 04:45, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

older entries
Results are from DGEQ where possible, but they don't have old historical data.

Also using results from "External sites" section, but beware, these can have errors! So check multiple sources.

- P.T. Aufrette 23:13, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Much better source of old historical info at: http://www.assnat.qc.ca/fr/patrimoine/index.html Will edit to reflect this.

- P.T. Aufrette 02:04, 13 Mar 2004 (UTC)

I have converted this page from a list of tables of results of each election into a series of summary tables. The tables on individual elections have been enhanced with more information, re-formatted, and transferred to the articles on each election.

Since this is no longer a list, I have re-named the article from "List of Quebec general elections" by moving it to "Quebec general elections". I hope that no-one minds me being bold. I think that this is a more useful arrangement of the information. Ground Zero 21:37, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

Change of layout?
What do people think of re-formatting this page so that it more along the lines of List of Newfoundland and Labrador general elections? Tompw (talk) 00:50, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

I took this template from the NS elections page,theres still a few wrong adressses in it,but the dates are correct.If this helps with the change of layout.-Monre

Wikified table?
Beh, the table code is ugly. Granted it only needs updates once in a while, but isn't a wikified table preferable? Arasaka (talk) 14:48, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

RE-edit: sorry, had not realised the above table was part of the previous post... 69.70.111.118 (talk) 16:17, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Done! Arasaka (talk) 13:56, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

switch tables
The 1867-1935 should appear before the 1935-present table. Really. Donutcity (talk) 22:45, 8 November 2015 (UTC)