Talk:List of Singapore MRT stations

dtl4 should be hume station
source : https://www.lta.gov.sg/apps/news/page.aspx?c=3&id=023044e4-2447-4263-8424-19d2b82f5b83 --Quek157 (talk) 17:42, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * with reference to it being a shell of course. plus, the peer review still need step 3, seems incomplete, fyi. thanks --Quek157 (talk) 19:48, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

necessary?
Is the Abbreviation and exact location really important to be on this list? are the Abbreviations even official? -155.69.160.33 (talk) 11:27, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I have the same concern. I doubt if subdivisions for census or planning purposes (which is listed on both Chinese and English versions of this list) are useful to list for even local Singaporeans. -- Spring Roll Conan ( Talk · Contributions ) 08:30, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Break into subdivisions?
Following List of Shanghai Metro stations, should we separate the list according to the lines? And about Hume, not yet please. And the abbreviations are necessary; used by SMRT for train disruptions or other announcements.--ZKang123 (talk) 14:09, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I do agree with ZKang123's idea to separate the list according to the lines as it makes it easily to read and view. Sorry for being late on this topics. Flipchip73 (talk) 05:56, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Although the Shanghai metro one is quite overwhelming but since we only have a fraction of the lines i would say it is fine either way for now. 1.02 editor (T/C) 11:18, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Map
Do note that the western section of the Cross Island Line is depicted in the Land Transport Masterplan 2040, and the "Pink Line" has been reported in local Straits Times articles. The map maker also made it explicitly clear in the map that the line is under studies. So there's nothing misleading about the map, which has been carefully researched. Seloloving (talk) 15:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Name(s) during planning stages
that column used to be only used for the working names. but now, we have the names from the public poll added in for circle line onwards. should those name even be there? they were never considered working names. the column is renamed to Name(s) during planning stages, is that the reason why those are included? -119.74.220.3 (talk) 13:15, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Parity issue/clarifications
Hi, any reasons why the future column has been removed? I was trying to match it up with LRT stations page, which currently has one as such.

So perhaps I think the solution is to have the other LRT page follow this format.

About the abbreviations, I can definitely confirm that tapping out on NEL side of DBG and OTP shows DBN and OTN respectively. Not sure if it was changed already, but that's as far as I can remember. OfficialCQJoker (talk) 04:11, 10 November 2021 (UTC)