Talk:List of apologetic works

Untitled
Is there any rationale for creating this list, it looks pointless to me. ping 08:09, 19 March 2006 (UTC)


 * My thoughts exactly. Honestly, would anyone like to defend this list? The only article of importance that links to it is Christian apologetics; there's no explanation for what is included on this list, or why it is limited to 20th century works. -- llywrch 21:47, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I think it is an excellent list for people who want more detail. ken 00:54, 19 June 2006 (UTC)kdbuffalo


 * I the idea of a "list of apologetic works" is fine, but the current contents are problematic. Besides Llywrch's point about the lack of pre-20th century works, I would note following from Lists (stand-alone lists): "Ideally each entry on the list should have a Wikipedia article but this is not required if it is reasonable to expect an article could be forthcoming in the future." The other lists in Category:Lists of controversial books appear to follow this guideline. It seems unlikely to me that most of the works currently in this list will ever have their own articles. EALacey 21:25, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I've made a start on linking authors and works with articles, and it's clear that the authors are far more likely to have articles than their works are. Maybe changing this article into a "List of religious apologists" would be more in keeping with the guidelines? EALacey 13:31, 18 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I agree -- bibliographies are acceptable but most of the books should have their own articles (see Lists (stand-alone lists) and compare Oz books and List of books by P. G. Wodehouse, for example) or be deserving of one under WP:BK (most here are not). I'd also note that Gordon Clark, Cornelius Van Til, and John Frame are noticeably absent from this list. I'm going to nominate this for deletion. --Fl e x (talk|contribs) 01:35, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of apologetic works. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080725065430/http://www.apologeticscourses.com/TextBooks to http://www.apologeticscourses.com/TextBooks

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:19, 28 December 2017 (UTC)