Talk:List of companies of Finland

There's Nokia, UPM-Kymmene and Nordea. Then there's Akado Oy (there's no "Oy" typed for other incorporated companies), which has a C/O address, has become VAT liable a year ago and is totally unknown in comparison to the rest of the companies in the article (come on, ask anyone). Is this firm really worth mentioning here?
 * Looks like a web page shop, there are lots and lots of them. Out it goes. Weregerbil 14:58, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * And is also listed in a very distorted alphabetical order. -- Extra   999  (Contact me  +  contribs) 16:13, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Stonesoft
We should remove Stonesoft, because it's today only part of Forcepoint. TheWiki122 (talk) 17:37, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of companies of Finland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101014010931/http://e24.no/makro-og-politikk/article3803493.ece to http://e24.no/makro-og-politikk/article3803493.ece

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:57, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Ahlstrom
Should Ahlstrom still be on the list after what happened with Munksjö? NearCry (talk) 11:17, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Always fuzzy. I've included notable subsidiaries on these lists as long as there is a separate article for the subsidiary (like Vodafone Hungary) and they maintain the brand. Is the "company" still around?


 * If there's a full merger-acquisition, the Ahlstrom name is gone, and they just run it as a sub, then I'd probably mark the company as defunct and keep it on the list. If there's a full merger-acquisition,the Ahlstrom brand is retained, and they keep a presence in Finland with a local "headquarters", then I'd probably keep it on the list as a "notable subsidiary".


 * My main question is always, "is there an independent article about an entity, and does that entity have a headquarters (regional or not) in the country"? Kuru   (talk)  11:53, 19 April 2018 (UTC)


 * I really don't have enough info on the topic. Maybe some Finn might have a look. Also I went through the list and there seemed to be alot of similar cases. NearCry (talk) 12:04, 19 April 2018 (UTC)