Talk:List of ice hockey teams in British Columbia

Reorganisation suggestion
I like this article. A lot. Can I make a suggestion, though - can we break it up into two parts, "Active" and "Past" teams? Av 18:54, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I had thought about that when deciding on the layout I wanted to use with these articles. Aside from doubling the length of the Table of Contents, I decided that grouping everything together by level of play, then by league looked cleaner.  It also makes it easier to tell at a glance how many championships each province has seen in each league when the existing and defunct teams are located close together, IMO. Resolute 20:31, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Category?
It might make sense to create a Category:British Columbia Hockey Teams as a subsection of Category:Sport in British Columbia and use a bot to add it to all the teams on this list (and remove the "Sports in BC" cat) -- TheMightyQuill 04:44, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Shouldn't "Established" be when the franchise was actually founded?
It seems like "Established" is used when the team moved to their current city. But it seems like the franchise is "Established" when it is founded, and I believe this field should reflect this, and perhaps the Notes field can reflect when they moved to their current city. Greg Salter (talk) 23:17, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Personally, I disagree. Knowing when a team was established in its current market is more important than the franchise founding date, imnsho.  The notes indicate where the franchise previously existed. Resolute 13:30, 4 April 2011 (UTC)