Talk:List of parks in San Diego

Sources are necessary
Please see WP:RS and WP:V. Quoting from it WP:V, "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth" and "Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed." There is no provision for list articles to be exempted from these policies. Removal of appropriate editorial templates is vandalism. Erechtheus 22:49, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I’m fully aware WP:V and WP:RS; however, as you stated above, references are only needed on “any material that is challenged or is likely to be challenged.” Are you actually changeling that these parks are not in San Diego? I removed Template:unref and added two references, even though I think it’s completely unnecessary to prove these parks are in San Diego when one can click their respective articles to see if the parks are in San Diego. Also, FYI, removing Template:unref is not considered vandalism beacuse it is a good faith edit. —Christopher Mann McKaytalk 23:23, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Public Park or not?
Some parks in the article stated admission fee, but the other parks no sign at all. It are public parks? Stated as public parks ensure us that there are no admission fees.Gsarwa (talk) 00:39, 25 July 2017 (UTC)