Talk:Living lab

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_park
I think it needs to be made clear how these 2 inter-relate. As there seems quite some overlap. Its not enough to say that Labs have computers so do Science Parks nowadays - does that make them the same?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.246.214.67 (talk) 18:11, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Copyright
Regarding the re-use of the Living Lab article of the ECOSPACE Newsletter published online in the AMI Communities wiki pages, I can explain that I'm the editor of the ECOSPACE Newsletter and the main author of this article on Living Lab. However, I thought that I'd included a proper reference to my Living Lab newsletter article. In case I did not then I'll be please to do so as soon as I can get a chance to edit and complete this wikipedia Living Lab page. Marcpallot (talk) 17:05, 1 April 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcpallot (talk • contribs) 16:23, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

After looking at the history page, I've got the confirmation that my previous article was in reference: Marcpallot (talk) 17:05, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Pallot, M; Trousse, B.; Prinz, W.;Richir, S.; de Ruyter, B.;Rerolle, O.: Katzy, B.;Senach, B.: Living Labs Research. ECOSPACE Special Issue Newsletter 5 dedicated to Living Labs, pages 15–22.


 * You can clear up the copyright concerns by emailing permissions-en@wikimedia.org as is described in the instructions on the article. Even with that cleared up, though, due to our policy on original research it is not a good idea to copy and paste your works from elsewhere into Wikipedia, or to cite yourself as a source for your edits to Wikipedia. The article may need an extensive rewrite (or deletion, depending on how many independent sources we can find) to repair that. - MrOllie (talk) 17:16, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Many thanks for your encouraging words, I really appreciate. As you may notice, I'm not the only source as there is a long reference list. However, I do agree that it would be better to synthetise this previous article instead of simply re-using it....just a minor problem of missing time...the most valuable resource...this is why I still beleive in the value of providing useful information/references to others even if this page is not yet a perfect one....may be I was too much expecting others to contribute to improve it. By the way, there are plenty of other pages in wikipedia that looks like promotional material...but I'm tolerant enough to just turn to other more interesting pages/articles....as I'm not a stupid robot. Marcpallot (talk) 17:48, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). Infringing material has been removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:19, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Living lab. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120509081658/http://www.cwe-projects.eu/pub/bscw.cgi/1760838?id=715404_1760838 to http://www.cwe-projects.eu/pub/bscw.cgi/1760838?id=715404_1760838
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120509081658/http://www.cwe-projects.eu/pub/bscw.cgi/1760838?id=715404_1760838 to http://www.cwe-projects.eu/pub/bscw.cgi/1760838?id=715404_1760838

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:32, 4 January 2018 (UTC)