Talk:Liz Kelly

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Liz Kelly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20140319143647/https://metranet.londonmet.ac.uk/research-units/hrsj/staff-and-associates/liz-kelly.cfm to https://metranet.londonmet.ac.uk/research-units/hrsj/staff-and-associates/liz-kelly.cfm
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20140319143647/https://metranet.londonmet.ac.uk/research-units/hrsj/staff-and-associates/liz-kelly.cfm to https://metranet.londonmet.ac.uk/research-units/hrsj/staff-and-associates/liz-kelly.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:50, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Merge proposal: Liz Kelly bibliography into this article
No need for seperate bibliography, I propose a merge. Sxologist (talk) 00:51, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm not seeing guidelines about when a separate bibliography is appropriate. Nothing is apparent to me in MOS:WORKS. Since it's far too long to be copied and pasted into Liz Kelly and someone took the time to compile it, I'm inclined to keep it. Daask (talk) 21:47, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Support merge, wholesale or with a trim; the bibliography is a trivial list of publications, less helpful than clicking the World-Cat link in the authority control box on Kelly's page. Having said this, even a whole-sale merge would not be WP:TOOBIG. I also don't support the argument that as "someone took the time to compile it [we should] keep it"; there is a lot of material on Wikipedia that other have worked on, but that should nevertheless be deleted as it is not encylopaedic. Klbrain (talk) 21:55, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ Klbrain (talk) 06:34, 27 July 2021 (UTC)