Talk:Long non-coding RNA

LncRNAs regulated by transcription factors
As of now this section is purely self-promotional — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.88.66.194 (talk) 16:25, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Moving to long non-coding RNA
Moving 'long noncoding RNA' to 'long non-coding RNA' (with hypen). This then conforms with non-coding RNA and is (marginally) more commonly seen in the literature, see pubmed searches for hyphenated (596) vs unhyphenated (522)numbers correct as of 10:56, 13 September 2010 (UTC)  J e b u s 9 8 9  ✰ 10:56, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

RE: Long ncRNAs in translation
I found out that the BC1 is 167 nucleotides long i.e. shorter than 200nt threshold. Here is the link: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NR_033762.1

Why do we consider it as LONG non-coding RNA? Dmanagadze (talk) 16:24, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Some LncRNAs are conventional
New research has found that some LncRNA can give rise to peptides. Link here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24705786 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.153.227.206 (talk) 23:06, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't know who started this topic, but based on a Nature paper in 2017 I added discussion about translation of lncRNAs DennisPietras (talk) 02:25, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

2017 database with accurate 5' ends
Comprehensive Atlas of Long Noncoding RNAs Yields Surprising New Role says "The atlas, which contains 27,919 lncRNAs, summarizes for the first time their expression patterns across major human cell types and tissues. By intersecting this atlas with genomic and genetic data, their results suggest that 19,175 of these RNAs may be functional, ..." - Rod57 (talk) 18:34, 4 March 2017 (UTC)