Talk:MacTheRipper

This article was nominated for deletion on 2 May 2010. The result of the discussion was keep.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Apple Inc. Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Heavy POV and citations needed[edit]

"The criminal behind MacTheRipper" should be rewritten. And citations are needed for the GPL violation allegations. 63.228.84.27 (talk) 22:57, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the mac the ripper site has been unavailable for at least a week. have they been busted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cleobolus (talk • contribs) 16:03, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

apparently the site has been down for two years. the main place to download it from now is macupdate.com. someone should presumably remove the link to the official site from the article, since it is not functional. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cleobolus (talk • contribs) 20:56, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edited the "official site" link to use the archive.org version from Aug 31 2007 which was the site's last update —DoRD (talk) 02:23, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 1, 2010 Anonymous editor (IP address posted) I noticed someone proposed this article for deletion in seven days, as described in "Wikipedia:Proposed deletion". Since I objected, because I believe this software to be well known and very notable I followed these instructions:

If any person objects to the deletion (usually by removing the

{{prod}}

tag), the proposal is aborted and may not be re-proposed.

According to what I understand, if anyone thinks this article should be deleted, they should create a discussion page where it can be discussed and debated. And before anyone asks, no, I have not previously edited or contributed here, I did what I thought was appropriate. I've thought about contributing, and I have read many of the policies, which I thought I should be familiar with first. If an administrator does not agree with what I did, and knows better, they should revert my change...

In sort, if did the the wrong thing, sorry. Oh well...—Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.247.227.233 (talk • contribs) 01:01, 2 May 2010

I would like this article to remain and I am willing to support it by updating it. Gus Calabrese Denver —Preceding unsigned comment added by Puppetboyx (talk • contribs) 15:19, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Version 4.0?"[edit]

Everywhere I looked, Version 2.6.6 is the highest. Perhaps a citation for a 4.0 is needed. 24.48.160.108 (talk) 14:01, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I made this suggested edit as I also only find 2.6.6. JesseStu (talk) 15:47, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]