Talk:Magnet Kitchens

Is the whole Buyer Beward section needed? Many groups are set up on facebook, it does not mean they have any substance. At best this highlighted section is unneeded and at worst it's defamation.

Constant page vandalism
This page keeps getting edited by a user 46.7.46.26 who appears to be using Wikipedia to further his own grievance aganst this company. See also revision history of Nobia Dominovitali (talk) 21:46, 10 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Remove The edit war has been going on at a low level since this edit on 8 November 2010. I have just removed this from the lead section:"In 2010 a Facebook group was set up with the aim of persuading Magnet Kitchens to improve its post sales service. The name of the group is titled: 'Magnet Kitchens (Avoid!)'. The creator felt it necessary to set it up having researched the amount of complaints made about the company, some of which are linked on the page. The Dublin based creator witnessed Magnet Kitchens take a substanial amount of his parents' savings only to deliver a substandard kitchen. They even recommended a tiler working for them that took only cash and didn't pay tax or provide recipt. The case went as far as court but had to be agreed upon outside court due to a technicality of there being no paperwork. The solicitor working on our behalf actually had another client taking action against Magnet and scheduled the two for the same day. Be very careful with this company! Buyer beware!"It is not strictly vandalism by our use of the term at Wikipedia. It is probable the editor adding the material believes it is an important improvement to the article, and so is probably a good faith effort. It does, however, fail to prove itself by citing reliable sources, fails to conform to our guideline on what is appropriate for lead paragraphs, and is not of sufficient relevance per this section (WP:DUE) of our policy on neutral point of view., please familiarise yourself with the policies I have linked to in this paragraph. Unless content conforms to WP policies and guidelines, it will be deleted. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 01:17, 13 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Remove as per Anthonyhcole. That content is partisan soapboxing and much more appropriate for something like Angie's List. --Tenebrae (talk) 16:15, 13 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Remove This shouldn't even be a question. The addition of partisan material that is not cited to a reliable source is strictly forbidden by policy. If 46.7.46.26 keeps edit warring to add it back as here, the IP should be blocked. LK (talk) 04:59, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Remove Obviously. Martin Hogbin (talk) 21:53, 17 August 2011 (UTC)