Talk:Mark J. Rozell

Conflict of interest
At least one major contributor to this article appears to have a close personal or professional connection to the topic, and thus to have a conflict of interest. Conflict-of-interest editors are strongly discouraged from editing the article directly, but are always welcome to propose changes on the talk page (i.e., here). You can attract the attention of other editors by putting request edit (exactly so, with the curly parentheses) at the beginning of your request, or by clicking the link on the lowest yellow notice above. Requests that are not supported by independent reliable sources are unlikely to be accepted.

Please also note that our Terms of Use state that "you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation." An editor who contributes as part of his or her paid employment is required to disclose that fact. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:18, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Deletion
Normally I support keeping the majority of Wikipedia articles, despite any POV issues they may have, but I think it's necessary in this case. The main contributors to the article appear to be paid or connected to the subject, and have repeatedly added material with a potential bias. Many references are indeed from reputable sources, but don't add anything to the article's main points and sections, which are just puffery of its subject. I think articles like this are a "gateway" to further COI in the project. User:Heyoostorm_talk! 19:50, 15 October 2020 (UTC)