Talk:Matches Fashion

Content
I changed the line "Matches also claim to foster" to "Try to work with". I agree that "Matches also remain committed to" was a bit subjective. Any thoughts? RoyalBlueStuey (talk) 08:58, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm just passing by but my general thought is that there's a couple of phrases which just sound a bit too "corporate", the sort of things that would appear on a company's website but never on a third-party encyclopedia. Things like "bring them to their customer-base" or "try to present customers with a selection of" rather than "sell". RoyalBlueStuey, I note that you have started a couple of articles on fashion/marketing companies and appear to be privy to private details such as website hits, might I invite you to read WP:COI and declare any relationship you might have with Matches? Things like the web hits will have to go unless you can find a public source for them. Le Deluge (talk) 12:14, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Facebook & Twitter links
I made edits whilst not logged in and the xlinkbot reverted them. I added links to Matches twitter and facebook pages. These are official outlets for Matches and were not on the list of frequently reverted links. If I am wrong to do this then I will not make further edits to include them. I am just assuming that it was because I wasn't logged in when making the changes. RoyalBlueStuey (talk) 09:11, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * No, social media are WP:LINKSTOAVOID. In general though any links added by anonymous editors will be treated extra sceptically. Le Deluge (talk) 12:14, 13 April 2011 (UTC)