Talk:Matt Oliver

This article was nominated for deletion on 28 July 2015. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Contested deletion[edit]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because...

1. It is not a hoax and is about a real, notable subject. There are clearly linked references that provide evidence why it is a real article.
2. It does not qualify as unambiguous advertising or promotion and is devoid of promotional content.
3. The article does not infringe on anyone's copyright.
4. The subject is notable, having received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. There does exist verifiable, objective evidence that the subject has received significant attention from independent sources that supports this claim.

Yogaball (talk) 01:47, 28 July 2015 (UTC)Yogaball[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This article you flagged should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because...

1. It is not a hoax and is about a real, notable subject. There are clearly linked references that provide evidence why it is a real article. 2. It does not qualify as unambiguous advertising or promotion and is devoid of promotional content. 3. The article does not infringe on anyone's copyright. 4. The subject is notable, having received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. There does exist verifiable, objective evidence that the subject has received significant attention from independent sources that supports this claim. Here are just a few.

http://www.austinchronicle.com/daily/music/2014-02-05/sound-teams-marathon/ http://www.austinchronicle.com/calendar/music/event-434178/ http://www.austinchronicle.com/music/2006-06-09/373254/ http://www.dailydot.com/entertainment/daytrotter-matt-oliver-countdown/ http://pitchfork.com/tv/39-pitchfork-nightcap/1182-peter-matthew-bauer-fortune-tellers/ http://www.theguardian.com/music/2015/apr/12/bop-english-constant-bop-review-deliriously-easy-to-listen-to

Furthermore, per the Criteria page, "It is irrelevant whether the claim of notability within the article is not sufficient for the notability guidelines. If the claim is credible, the A7 tag can not be applied. Often what seems non-notable to a new page patroller is shown to be notable in a deletion discussion." So clearly A7 doesn't work here.

Otherwise please tell me how this article can be improved.

Thanks.

There are a few references that are of depth; however, too many are just single line mentions or do not mention the article subject. I am considering moving to an AfD to get more eyes on the article. reddogsix (talk) 04:08, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Matt Oliver. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.austin360.com/music/content/music/stories/xl/2006/06/8cds.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:24, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]