Talk:Maximum sustained wind

What more is needed?
I get the impression we need to add more information to this article before thinking of GA, but am at a loss as to what might be missing. Any ideas? Thegreatdr (talk) 22:53, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Per the GA review, more references were added. Also, a new section was added after further thought.  The article has been submitted for GA once more.  Thegreatdr (talk) 20:48, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Well my problem with the article is that it opens with "maximum sustained wind associated with a tropical cyclone" and I came to this page trying to find out about "maximum sustained wind" having nothing to do with a tropical cyclone. I'm not sure an article on a term which seems to have general use when describing weather should just be about cyclones. If it really needs to be I guess there could be a disambiguation page but I like opening the article with a general definition of the term. Examples of typical wind-speeds might help. Then follow with the cyclone specific information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.119.217.183 (talk) 05:43, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

T-Number?
Under the heading "Determination of value", there are a number of images under the sub-heading "Satellite Images of Selected Tropical Storms and Associated T-Number". Below the images, there is the name of the storm and a T-Number such as "Hurricane Emily at T6.0". There is no explanation what these T-Numbers are. There is also no explanation on the linked page Tropical_cyclone_observation (but the same images are used there, so I include this comment on that page as well). SmilingBoy (talk) 11:12, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Explanation of T numbers is on the Dvorak technique page. Thegreatdr (talk) 01:51, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 23:32, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Maximum sustained wind. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120905133143/http://www.nwas.org/ej/pdf/2006-EJ4.pdf to http://www.nwas.org/ej/pdf/2006-EJ4.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:12, 23 January 2018 (UTC)