Talk:Mesh Computers

Articles for deletion/Mesh Computers
This article was nominated for deletion on 29 January 2006, at Articles for deletion/Mesh Computers. The original listing gathered no consensus, and was relisted for further discussion. Due to some confusion in the relisting, the discussion was closed shortly after the relisting (at which point, 6 new comments had been added the initial nomination and sole comment prior to relisting, and consensus was developing to delete). During a Deletion review, new evidence came to light addressing the reasons for deletion; the article was then undeleted. It was not relisted on AfD as consensus at DRV was that it would survive easily per the new information. -- Jonel | Speak 22:28, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - It is unclear that a consensus to delete was developing after the relisting; merely that at the time of closure a consensus to delete was there. Also, the article was undeleted as being out of process, not due to new evidence. Hiding  talk 22:44, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - By "consensus was developing", I did not mean to imply that such a trend was irreversible by further commentary (terminology issue there, I think we're trying to say the same thing). And User:Hiding is quite correct in that the undeletion was due to the error in process, though it was the new evidence that kept the article from being relisted.  I apologize for the lack of clarity. -- Jonel | Speak 01:43, 8 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The DRV discussion contains the new evidence. It should probably be incorporated into the article. --- Charles Stewart(talk) 16:35, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - This article reads like an advert for the company, especially the Award Winning PCs bit. I don't come here often enough, nor know enough about the company, to be able to offer any improvements, but felt it needed flagging up. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Oolon Colluphid (talk • contribs) 14:24, 12 March 2007 (UTC).

Fair use rationale for Image:Mesh Computers.png
Image:Mesh Computers.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:58, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Support section
I've removed the line about the company's support, as it is unreferenced and is negative. Please only add it back when you're able to find reliable sources to prove it. Netalarm  talk  22:42, 20 September 2009 (UTC)