Talk:Microsoft Personal Web Server

It should definitely be merged. The 2 articles are about the same thing, just using different names. -localzuk 10:34, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

I disagree. There are a variety of companies that have launched offerings dubbed as "personal web servers" so merging this definition into Microsoft is completely inappropriate. mediaresearcher, August 8, 2006

Lack of references leading to false information
See (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc723558.aspx) date reference Nov 1997 about PWS 1.0a on Win95. PWS on Win98 CD had a higher 1.x version. Also "Microsoft FrontPage Personal Web Server" (support.microsoft.com/kb/161417/EN-US; support.microsoft.com/kb/161418; ) PWS 2.0 download version and available on FrontPage 97 and FP98 (support.microsoft.com/kb/258635; http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin/ms99-010); PWS 2.0 was no longer available after Windows ME shipped. It was superior to IIS4 when IIS4 was installed (installer limited) on Win9x. Shjacks45 (talk) 10:33, 5 January 2014 (UTC)