Talk:Midian

NPOV or not
This is not very NPOV.... it assumes biblical events & explanations as fact... fundies may so believe, but many think thats a crock — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.136.122.179 (talk • contribs) 01:17, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Although I understand your reasoning, the article mentions multiple times that information on Midian and the Midianites comes largely from the Bible. --Merovingian (t) (c) 01:19, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

On the contrary, it is very NPOV. For such characters of such antiquity the ONLY information we have of them is legend, deduction and what is believed to be holy writ. You must either prove the current sources wrong or find another. The only thing is that achaeology is confirming these sources. I would dare suggest that the reader may be the one who needs to consider if they have a neuteral point of view. --Avanduyn (talk) 09:43, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I disagree. In instances where the Bible is the only source of information, the Wiki page must include, "according to the biblical book of Numbers..." or words to that effect. For NPOV, one cannot take ANY single source as factual, even if that single source is the Bible... especially if it's the Bible! --Edward-F (talk) 03:19, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
 * P.S. When writing or editing an encyclopaedic article, the onus is not on the editor to prove the current source wrong. The source has to be proven right for it to be presented as fact.--Edward-F (talk) 03:21, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Just out of interest, which books/sources would you consider to be proven right from around this period, or indeed any period before the printing press? Epideme (talk) 01:15, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree. This article is a farce. It even speculates about Abraham's motives while he fulfilled god's commission. As the existence of Abraham is very much unproven, never mind his god, this is nowhere near the standard required for an encyclopaedia. It has to go. FergusM1970 (talk) 16:40, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Moses' Orders
Ive added to the section describing Moses' prescribed punishment for the Midianites. According to the Book of Numbers, he ordered his soldiers to kill all male children, and all non-virgin females. He then allowed the Israelite men to take the virgin women.

Marcadams99 05:23, 21 July 2007 (UTC) Marcus, July, 20th, 2007

"Citation Needed" Tags
I've added tags on three paragraphs that really kicked off some questions. If we've only tentatively identified the Midianites with the Hyksos, it seems odd for the article to claim that they have a specific geographic location, economy, or archaeological finds. I won't be able to take a look at this stuff until towards the end of the month, but if no one's addressed these citations, I'll start digging into my archaeology journals. Justin Eiler 23:28, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

I've gone ahead and removed those sections--they're quoted below. Anyone who has a citation for these assertions is more than welcome to re-add the sentences and plug in the citations.

From "Midian"
 * Further evidences of the geographical position of the Midianites appear in a survey of their history.

From "Economy" (section header removed)
 * For a time during the decline of Egyptian power in the Levant, the Midianites controlled the copper mines at Timna. They were a sophisticated people whose territory sat astride several important trade routes of the ancient world- including the King's Highway. Rolls of fine cloth and beads have been discovered at Midianite sites, as well as fine objects of worked copper.

From "Midian"
 * Copper sculptures of serpents from Midianite sites are reminiscent of the Biblical story of Nahushtan (Numbers 21:6-9), a bronze snake statue created by Moses to stave off snake attacks. This has led to speculation of an ophidian cult among the Midianites, as existed among other ancient people, such as the Marsi.

Justin Eiler 16:26, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Article moved
For reference during the discussion:

This article was moved from Midian to Midian (son of Abraham) with the edit summary "for consistency". I don't understand that. Of the sons of Abraham, only Medan has a more significant meaning and that son's article is therefore located at Medan (son of Abraham). There was no need to move the others, as they are not ambiguous. See WP:NAME. Please comment below as I am inclined to move it (and the others) back. - Fayenatic (talk) 19:47, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

You seem right! I cannot find any reason as well! --Submitter to Truth (talk) 08:23, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * It's odd that this article makes no mention of the person Midian or of any connection between the Midianites and Abraham; therefore, I have take the "son of Abraham" page and turned it into a bio page for the person. This page can then remain focused on the region and the people. Aristophanes68 (talk) 15:35, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

ODD RESULTS ON FIREFOX
The printable version, when Viewed on Firefox, looks normal, but when printed via Firefox the Hebrew words are reversed -- the correct letters but running left-to-right instead of right-to-left. This does not happen with IE7, which prints the Hebrew correctly. Darndest thing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.178.242.140 (talk) 23:38, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Why does it say the name in Arabic?
Why does it say the name in Arabic? If we were to put it in more languages, then Greek would probably take a bigger priority. The Arabic version of the Bible came much later. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 35.11.56.20 (talk) 07:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Because the People of the Book, Christians Jews and Islamics speak different languages. In the time of Midian the languages of western Arabia were Afroasiatic Beja, Cushitic, Berber and Omotic rather than semitic. The writing originated in Arabia and did not come from outside, was not western semitic, Canaanite, Akkadian or Egyptian but rather an Arabian language written in Thamudic script (wasums) developed from rock art. The language at Elat was Egyptian and in Edom was Canaanite c 1450 BC

And because Midyan is an area in Greater Arabia, and its history part of Arabian lore. Asking this question presupposes certain biases and a POV. Have you looked at Midian on a map lately? Putting the Arabic for a place name that is considered in Arabia is as proper as it gets. In any case for non-original research examine Richard Burton's travels through Midian. - Anonymous 208.65.192.1 (talk) 04:07, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Missing detail in reference
In the time of Midian the languages of western Arabia were Afroasiatic Beja, Cushitic, Berber and Omotic [13] rather than semitic. "Loprieno "Ancient Egyptian" p5"

Does anyone have an actual reference to this comment? I looked the mentioned book up in Google books und could not find anything on p5.

Google Books Ancient Egyptian "Loprieno" http://books.google.com/books?id=5OkIeaxGg2sC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Loprieno+Ancient+Egyptian&hl

August09 (talk) 11:25, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Religious Speculation around Mouth Horeb
--Avanduyn (talk) 03:56, 19 October 2009 (UTC)I personally found this section to be speculative in it's current form and believe it needs extensive clarification and referencing before entering the main article again. I have left it here to aid in it's development.

The Midianites also seem to have been centered around a cultic site at Mount Horeb. This has led some scholars to speculate that the worship of YHWH (a name of God in Judaism) may have actually begun among the Midianites to be adapted later by the Israelites, a claim contested by many Christian scholars. Josephus, in "Antiquities Of The Jews," BK IV, Chapter VI, clearly contradicts this claim as he portrays in extensive narrative the seduction of young men of the Israelite Army, during the time of Moses, by Midianite women who enticed the Israelites through lewdness and idolatry to worship their gods in return for their remaining with them. An Egyptian inscription refers to "Yhw in the land of the Shasu" as a tribe or people living in what would later become Midianite territory.

New Bible References Secton
It seems to me that the Bible References in it's current form is an attempt at retelling every bible story with midian in it in as condensed a version as possible. I believe this article needs to be encyclopedic and far more objective in telling us about Midian. Hence I will use this page as a developmental section as I work toward a replacement section... which may take some time.

Yet it may yet prove that this section will have to be merged with 'History' due to the fact that much of what we know of them comes mostly from the Hebrew scriptures.--Avanduyn (talk) 03:41, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Beginnings
At the first we find Abraham begetting Midian by his concubine and then some time later Issac by his wife Sarah; from Issac we find Esau who went and dwelt in Mt. Seir  and lived with the troglodytes, to found the race of Edomites. This land came to be known by the Hebrews as Edom, which Esau and those after him ruled. Yet various people populated this vast land, namely the Children of Midian and the incestuous product of Lot and his older daughter, the Moabites, along with a sprinkling of Amorites to Lot's younger daughter. These races live seperately but contemporaniously; but the book of Genesis clearly shows how the Moabites came to the dominance in a singular battle "in the field of Moab" against the forces of Midian. Some five hundred years later when the children of Israel return we still find the continuance of this contemporaneous co-existance with dominance of Moab in Balak's and the Midianites collusion to exterminate Israel.

Location and Lifestyle
Archeaology grants us with a spread of 'Midianite wares' rangeing from Iraq, Jordan, Arabia to the Negev desert in southen Israel, presenting us with a spread population not just limited to the domains of Edom. Yet their own lands cannot be easily defind, but available evidence indicates that it must have extended from the eastern shores of the Sinai peninsula to the deserts east of the Gulf of Aqabah, Edom and Moab.

This race of tent-dwellers were led by five kings, each representing one of Midian's five son, of which the tribe of Epher seems to have been the wealthiest, typified by the copious trade in camels an dromidaries. . The story of Joseph also presents them as unscrupled traders, willing to sell their second or third half cousin into slavery.

The enterance of several million hostile people into Palastine, mustered every fiber of cowardice or of desperate resistance.

<? --- more to come on use of 'Swift Camels' - Judges 6-8 two princes Oreb (Hebrew: עֹרֵב, Orev) and Zeeb (Hebrew: זְאֵב, Z'ev)

Any connection to Midian (son of Abraham)?
I noticed that this article makes no mention of any connection between the Midianites and the son of Abraham. So, I removed the redirect from "Midian (son of Abraham)" and made that a separate article on the person. But I also notice that the article on Abraham says he is the founder of the Midianites. If this is correct, then I think it should be mentioned in this article; if it's not correct, it needs to be removed from the Abraham article. Aristophanes68 (talk) 15:32, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

I would like to add that though there has been vigorous studies on The Bible, the information given is incomplete and lacks substance in a lot of cases. The midianites a tribe from Abrahams marriage to Keturah Genesis 25:1-2 have been placed geographicaly in present day Yemen and this is incorrect from The Bible. Midianites were a tribe that belonged to ethiopia Numbers 12:1. from whom Moses married his wife Ziporah. This would mean that Moses met GOD first on the mountains of Ethiopia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.177.106.230 (talk) 00:09, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Do nomadic shepherds grow corn?
The section Geographical location and culture says that "The Midianites were nomadic shepherds who ... lived in tents of goat hair and ate mostly bread ...". Being nomadic, presumably they got their bread from Greggs the Bakers? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.97.218.33 (talk) 18:30, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Midianite pottery
Maybe I am missing something, but shouldn't there be a section on Midian pottery? Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midianite_pottery http://www.bible.ca/archeology/bible-archeology-midianite-pottery.htm RANDOM78 (talk) 20:45, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

median?
i know it seems anachronistic, slightly, but considering that abraham probably never actually existed, i'd just like to throw out the idea of associating this person with the medes, rather than an arabic tribe, and if anybody is willing to tie that to the brahma/abraham similarity.

It is not just anachronistic, it makes no sense and exhibits a certain bias. Whether you think or modern scholarship thinks Abraham existed or not is irrelevant. The character, his name, and his linkage with origin stories for the Midianites and their region, Midian, is part of the lore of the Semitic speaking peoples of the region, both Arab and Israelite, and has been for thousands of years. There is absolutely no base from antiquity to even more tendentiously and tenuously link him to the Medes outside of modern linguistic speculation, mostly of a Hindu/Aryan/Iranian nationalist religio/nationalistic bent. - Anonymous 208.65.192.1 (talk) 04:12, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Midian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050721134132/http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/b/burton/richard/b97m/preface1.html to http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/b/burton/richard/b97m/preface1.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051024234638/http://www.gemsinisrael.com/e_article000002707.htm to http://www.gemsinisrael.com/e_article000002707.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:52, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Recent Reverts
, you are currently re-inserting the same text over and over, over the objections of multiple editors. This is edit-warring, and a failure to observe the norms outlined at WP:CONSENSUS. Instead of violating Wikipedia policy by repeatedly inserting your preferred version of things repeatedly, you need to come to the talk page and try to gain consensus first.

One problem with the text you keep trying to insert is that you have not provided a source for your claim that Midian is first mentioned in the Bible. There are some other problems, but you would need, at the very least, a source first. See WP:V about sources. Alephb (talk) 22:44, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Mountains
See this regarding my decision to redirect the related stub Midian Mountains, which I created, to this article. Leo1pard (talk) 16:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

“Cult”
Objection: Reference and inference to “religion” of YAWEH(Ancient Israel’s belief in God) as “cult” 23.251.65.204 (talk) 11:00, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
 * What is your problem with that? Cult is a standard term for religious devotion to deities. Dimadick (talk) 16:08, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Murder of the Midian
Right now the article reads "War against Midian followed. Numbers 31 reports that all but the virgin females were slain and their cities burned to the ground." while the next sentence mentions "Some commentators, for example the Pulpit Commentary and Gill's Exposition of the Bible, note that God's command focused on attacking the Midianites and not the Moabites,[23] and similarly Moses in Deuteronomy directed that the Israelites should not harass the Moabites"

If the direction of gods command and Moses direction are mentioned, should we not also mention Moses 4.31.14-18 ? From the King James Bible (https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Numbers%2031%3A14-18&version=KJV) "14 And Moses was wroth with the officers of the host, with the captains over thousands, and captains over hundreds, which came from the battle. 15 And Moses said unto them, Have ye saved all the women alive? 16 Behold, these caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to commit trespass against the Lord in the matter of Peor, and there was a plague among the congregation of the Lord. 17 Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. 18 But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves."

Right now it reads as if the children of Isreal slaid the Midian male kids and babies as well as the women at the same time as the men. Yet all men were killed during the war and women and children taken prisoner. After the war on the way back Moses wrathfully orders the death of the prisoners, except the virgins.

The way it is right now is midleading, downplaying the horror ordered by one of the most important figures in the old testament. The murder of prisoners, especially children, in this way can only be described as genocide in our modern days. Also the morals of the ancient Isrealites prevented them from slaying the later victims in the war and they had to be ordered by Moses to commit such acts. It seems important, that: a) woman and children were first taking prisioners, b) Moses ordered the murder of them, especially the "little ones", c) the surviving virgin females were taken "for themselves" and, as mentioned later on, divided with the rest of the spoils of war.

Request:

If there are no objections I would suggest, pointing out at least points a) - c), for example: Numbers 31 reports that all men were killed in the war against their cities and the rest of the Midianites were taken prisoner. Brought before Moses, he ordered to kill all prisoners but the virgin females, which he orderd to be divided with the other spoils of war.

We already have a lengthly discussion about the ethics of this sections on wiki in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numbers_31, which could/should be linked to here as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:C0:7720:E0E1:DC34:1114:16A3:571F (talk) 15:14, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

About current Ismaelites redirection
Hello,

Currently Ismaelites redirects to Midian, but shouldn’t it rather redirection to Isma'ilism instead? 2A02:2788:228:2EE:A8D2:416E:389F:B1B1 (talk) 20:02, 23 June 2024 (UTC)