Talk:Nancy Pelosi/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: StudiesWorld (talk · contribs) 19:40, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Criteria
 Good Article Status - Review Criteria   		A good article is&mdash;  :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

:
 * (a) ;
 * (b) ;
 * (c) ; and
 * (d).

:
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

. . :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).



Review
 <li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>.</li>

<li>.</li> <li>:</li>

</ol>

Discussion
Comment I have some concerns about the first few sections of this article. For the sake of transparency, I have worked on this article although I am not a top contributor. The sections contain several short paragraphs and leave unexplained gaps in her early career. For example, there is nothing covering the time between her being a Congressional intern in the 1960's to her being elected to the DNC from California in 1976. The article also says she resigned as DSCC chair in 1986 without saying when she became DSCC chair or explaining the DSCC. The 'Committee assignments' and 'Pre-speakership career' subsections are also too brief when compared to sections covering more recent periods of time. It seems implausible to me that, other than the Democratic caucus, the House Baltic Caucus would be her only notable caucus membership. Based on some research I did for this article when revising the Early life section, I think there is a lot more relevant and important information that is not currently covered in this article. Knope7 (talk) 17:42, 5 May 2019 (UTC) --DannyS712 (talk) 06:07, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Addressing the concerns
 * 1) Lifesitenews - ✅
 * 2) New York Post - ❌, since its only used once and is relevant and needed in context
 * 3) "In 2012, she was given 0% ratings by both..." ✅ (actually was 0 and 7, not both 0)
 * 4) "Pelosi has voted to increase Medicare and Medicaid benefits." ✅
 * 5) "She has also voted to remove an amendment..." ✅
 * 6) "Pelosi has supported the development..." ✅
 * 7) "Pelosi voted for the No Child Left Behind Act..." ✅ for the statement
 * 8) "in 2004 and 2006..." ✅
 * 9) NewsMax ✅
 * 10) about.com ✅ with the new york times
 * I've addressed the concerns you raised about sources --DannyS712 (talk) 03:37, 15 May 2019 (UTC)