Talk:National Eating Disorders Association

About Recreating Article
I've satisfied every element of WP:C and WP:CP that applied to the original article. I'm sure that recreating a deleted article will receive extra scrutiny, from admins. If there are still lingering problems please FIX THEM, or address them here, instead of just deleting the article. I would expect that from 99% of Wiki-admins, for a legitimate good faith effort.
 * Tiki God 21:17, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on National Eating Disorders Association. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101213224232/http://www.nationaleatingdisorders.org:80/programs-events/annual-neda-conference.php to http://www.nationaleatingdisorders.org/programs-events/annual-neda-conference.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 09:26, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Information about eating disorders
Current fairly lengthy section 4 is about what eating disorders are. I'm not sure this article is the right place for this in-depth description of EDs - article is supposed to be primarily about the organisation. Any views on cutting it down? Tacyarg (talk) 00:10, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Recent changes
, thanks for adding information to the article. There are some issues with it
 * 1) The Mission and Focus section currently lists various works funded by NEDA. The list has no sources, but even if there were sources, I'm not sure such a list belongs to the article. We should have a brief summary and maybe mention the most prominent research funded by NEDA (most prominent = mentioned by other reliable sources). Please take a look at the article about the National Science Foundation for comparison.
 * 2) The Statnews article has a pretty obvious conflict of interest as it's written by the creators of the chatbot. We should probably mention it as a reaction to the accusations in the media but we absolutely cannot say that it "laid to rest the mischaracterization of the use of Tessa" per WP:NPOV.

I'll revert your changes for now, happy to help with the editing. Alaexis¿question? 09:50, 11 June 2023 (UTC)